We deal the interesting topic concerning individuation of the role assigned to bodies in charge of vigilance and control within instances of personal data processing; these bodies are by their nature independent to the entity they supervise, even when being part of it.
Here you can see the video of Ms Maria Roberta Perugini’s speaking “GDPR: THE RISKS OF NON COMPLIANCE BETWEEN CIVIL ACTIONS AND FINES”, held on February 7 in occasion of a conference in Milan: Herebelow attached also the relevant slides.
We publish the slides of the event.
Architecture of GDPR as an answer to the modern need for a sustainable development of technological dynamics: in the video herewith attached Ms. Maria Roberta Perugini informally summarizes the fundamentals of privacy reform introduced by EU Regulation on data protection.
Among the topics of current interest in the field of protection of personal data are the limits on use of the information published on social networks, especially in view of the regulatory changes introduced by the EU General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”). This article identifies the consequences of this issue arising from the exception on the prohibition of “processing special categories of personal data” (Art. 9 GDPR) for cases where the processing relates to “personal data which are manifestly made public by the interested party “(paragraph 2, lett. e).
On 10 January, the European Commission presented a proposal for a Regulation (hereafter, the “Regulation”) concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in electronic communications, aimed at repealing Directive 2002/58/EC (hereafter, the “ePrivacy Directive”).
As is widely known, the European Union General Data Protection Regulation, which replaces Directive 95/46/EC, will come into force in May 2018 and will bring relevant changes to all stakeholders: DPAs, individuals, controller and processor organizations. In order to help organizations understand the key operational impacts of the regulation and to stimulate their internal change, the Centre for Information Policy Leadership – a global privacy and security think tank that works to advance privacy and security policy, law and practice – launched a survey (respondents were both data controllers and data processors of multinational organizations with an annual revenue size ranged from less than $1 million to more than $100 billion, that predominantly operated in Europe and in the US) to evaluate their progress towards true operationalization for GDPR readiness.
